‘Big Win for Animal Welfare’: Planning Approval for Controversial Puppy Farm in Horncastle Quashed After Legal Challenge
A retrospective application for a puppy farm has been quashed following legal action brought by Communities Against Factory Farming (CAFF).
Following significant objections from members of the public, the application was originally rejected on the grounds of animal welfare and noise.
Yet the facility had been granted permission to operate in May 2026 after the applicant’s appeal to the planning inspectorate was successful.
But CAFF’s judicial review against the granting of the appeal led to the planning inspectorate admitting that he had been wrong to overturn the council’s decision.
An unlicensed dog breeding operation in Horncastle has failed to obtain the necessary planning permission to operate as a licenced puppy farm after a legal challenge led to approval for the controversial farm being quashed.
In September 2025, East Lindsey District Council (ELDC) refused to grant retrospective planning permission to Minting Farm, which had operated without a licence for around three years, based on animal welfare grounds and noise concerns.
The applicant appealed to the planning inspectorate successfully, leading Communities Against Factory Farming (CAFF) to start legal proceedings.
In the latest twist, the planning inspectorate has conceded that he was wrong to grant the appeal. The applicant has also conceded. Residents are hopeful that the council will take enforcement action and stop the dog breeding operations.
Acknowledging that the appeal has been granted erroneously, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “The Inspector appears to have dismissed the proposed Claimant’s criticism of the Noise Impact Assessment on a false and/or inconsistent basis.”
This success in stopping a dog breeding facility is a significant win for animal welfare, since an animal breeding business that would have subjected animals to very poor welfare conditions was rejected on welfare grounds.
At the committee meeting which resulted in the original refusal, Councillor Robert Watson said that he was “minded to reject the application on the grounds of animal welfare and I have strong moral concern that that should be the case.”
Maya Pardo, Legal Coordinator at Communities Against Factory Farming (CAFF) said:
“It is a massive relief that the verdict is now final and no more dogs will suffer on this farm. In our nation of animal lovers, it is right that animal welfare should be given considerable weight as a material planning consideration.”
Paul Wyard, Solicitor at Richard Buxton Solicitors acting for Communities Against Factory Farming in this case, said:
“Success in this challenge vindicates the efforts of CAFF and others to stop unregulated dog breeding at Minting Farm. It is also a win for local democracy as councillors, echoing their constituents’ views, were clear that harm to dogs on site was an important factor in their original decision to refuse.”
Tanvi Sengupta of the Environmental Law Foundation, who supported the legal challenge, said:
"ELF is delighted that the concerns of the local community have been heard, and hopes that the Council will now take regulatory action to ensure this unlawful activity, which is causing so many dogs to suffer needlessly, will be halted."
ENDS
Word Count: 522
About CAFF
Communities Against Factory Farming (CAFF) works closely with residents across the UK to review planning applications for intensive farms and submit strong, evidence‑based planning objections. The organisation has helped communities block and overturn multiple intensive poultry unit applications when councils overlooked key environmental and animal‑welfare issues.
For more information or further comments, please contact:
Daniel (Press Back Office) press@caff.org.uk